To
"plagiarize" means
- to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own
- to use (another's production) without crediting the source
- to commit literary theft
- to present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source¹
Maybe that’s a little harsh for the
book I just finished… but it was what I was thinking most of the time I was
reading. It honestly wasn’t that the
story was exactly the same, but the sentiments, dialog, and descriptive passages
just felt SO familiar.
When I read the Amazon reviews I
knew that several of them mentioned a strong resemblance to Twilight for the first part of the
book. I figured there have been several
books that people have compared that way and it didn’t bother me, so no big
deal. That’s why the first few chapters
came as a surprise. They didn’t resemble
Twilight in any way I could see. The story was very different – girl moving
out to go to college, has a terrible relationship with her mom, and her dad
only ever enters the story through phone calls.
Nothing like Twilight. Then she sees Samuel (who she technically met
on the airplane home in the first chapter) in her class and some things seem to
click. The more she interacts with him
and Duncan (2 guys instead of 1 is also different) the more they seem like
copies of Edward. There is even a strange passage about how hard it is for Samuel to be around her… just like Edward
was with Bella because he was attracted to her blood. Except that we learn halfway through that
Samuel and Duncan are not technically vampires and don’t drink blood so that
just seems like Burd took a good scene from Twilight
and plunked it in the middle of Immortal
for no particular reason.
The story goes on and gets less and
less like Twilight, but certain
similarities are still left in. Like
Alina running to certain death, away from the creature trying to protect her,
toward those who want to hurt her in hopes of protecting the ones she
loves.
So which is more plagiarism? To use the same storyline like Ignite (which I discuss {HERE}) or to
use incredibly familiar phrasing, and sentiments? Maybe neither falls completely under that
law, but I still think it’s time for authors to find their own ideas. And I’m wondering if Burd just gave up because
of all the people who thought the same as I do, or if she actually got in
trouble for her writing. All I know is
that in April of 2012 someone asked her (via the Amazon forum) when the 3rd
book of this “Trilogy” would be released and she replied that she was working
on it and expected release later that year.
There has been nothing heard from her again, on Amazon or her blog… yet
a Tweet (having nothing to do with writing) was posted from her only 2 days
ago, so she is still alive. I’m baffled?!?
Could be she just got bored. That is the risk you run with reading an
Indie author who hasn’t finished the series yet.
So back to the topic at hand. Is this plagiarism? I think honestly it falls in a gray area but
if you read the definition I used (sited properly below) then “ideas” is one of the things you need to be careful
about. What do you think? Even if you haven’t read these books are
there others you think fall too close to each other?
Let's see....
ReplyDeleteA love triangle.....When isn't there one? :)
Vampires......though it's been done, I don't know anyone has a copyright on it.
All throughout history stories have been influenced by OTHER stories. Is that plargiarism?
I don't think there is a line separating what is or isnt. It will always be grey.
I know I didn't clearly define my stance on this, probably because it would vary according to circumstance or story. But it is indeed an interesting subject and would make for a great debate!